The SAS System 12:27 Tuesday, April 24, 2007 1 The FREQ Procedure Table of gender by Stress gender Stress Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚ 1‚ 2‚ 3‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 83 ‚ 32 ‚ 29 ‚ 144 ‚ 28.33 ‚ 10.92 ‚ 9.90 ‚ 49.15 ‚ 57.64 ‚ 22.22 ‚ 20.14 ‚ ‚ 59.71 ‚ 35.16 ‚ 46.03 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 2 ‚ 56 ‚ 59 ‚ 34 ‚ 149 ‚ 19.11 ‚ 20.14 ‚ 11.60 ‚ 50.85 ‚ 37.58 ‚ 39.60 ‚ 22.82 ‚ ‚ 40.29 ‚ 64.84 ‚ 53.97 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 139 91 63 293 47.44 31.06 21.50 100.00 Statistics for Table of gender by Stress Statistic DF Value Prob ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Chi-Square 2 13.5710 0.0011 Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square 2 13.7229 0.0010 Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square 1 6.0631 0.0138 Phi Coefficient 0.2152 Contingency Coefficient 0.2104 Cramer's V 0.2152 Sample Size = 293 The SAS System 12:27 Tuesday, April 24, 2007 2 The CATMOD Procedure Data Summary Response Stress Response Levels 3 Weight Variable count Populations 2 Data Set STRESS Total Frequency 293 Frequency Missing 0 Observations 53 Population Profiles Sample gender Sample Size ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 1 1 144 2 2 149 Response Profiles Response Stress ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 1 1 2 2 3 3 Maximum Likelihood Analysis Maximum likelihood computations converged. Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Variance Source DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Intercept 2 28.04 <.0001 gender 2 13.28 0.0013 Likelihood Ratio 0 . . Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Function Standard Chi- Parameter Number Estimate Error Square Pr > ChiSq ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Intercept 1 0.7753 0.1531 25.63 <.0001 2 0.3248 0.1674 3.76 0.0523 gender 1 1 0.2763 0.1531 3.25 0.0712 1 2 -0.2264 0.1674 1.83 0.1763 The SAS System 12:27 Tuesday, April 24, 2007 3 The CATMOD Procedure Maximum Likelihood Predicted Values for Response Functions ------Observed------ ------Predicted----- Function Standard Standard gender Number Function Error Function Error Residual ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 1 1 1.051545 0.21571 1.051545 0.21571 0 2 0.09844 0.256384 0.09844 0.256384 0 2 1 0.498991 0.217414 0.498991 0.217414 0 2 0.551177 0.215316 0.551177 0.215316 0 Maximum Likelihood Predicted Values for Frequencies -------Observed------ ------Predicted------ Standard Standard gender Stress Frequency Error Frequency Error Residual ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 1 1 83 5.929563 83 5.929563 0 2 32 4.988877 32 4.988875 0 3 29 4.812455 29 4.812455 0 2 1 56 5.912108 56 5.912108 0 2 59 5.969722 59 5.969722 0 3 34 5.122657 34 5.122656 0