ROC plot The LOGISTIC Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.CHEESE Response Variable response Number of Response Levels 9 Frequency Variable count Model cumulative logit Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring Number of Observations Read 36 Number of Observations Used 28 Sum of Frequencies Read 208 Sum of Frequencies Used 208 Response Profile Ordered Total Value response Frequency 1 9 12 2 8 25 3 7 39 4 6 28 5 5 41 6 4 27 7 3 19 8 2 10 9 1 7 Probabilities modeled are cumulated over the lower Ordered Values. NOTE: 8 observations having nonpositive frequencies or weights were excluded since they do not contribute to the analysis. Class Level Information Class Value Design Variables cheese A 0 0 0 B 1 0 0 C 0 1 0 D 0 0 1 ROC plot The LOGISTIC Procedure Model Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Score Test for the Proportional Odds Assumption Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq 17.2866 21 0.6936 Deviance and Pearson Goodness-of-Fit Statistics Criterion Value DF Value/DF Pr > ChiSq Deviance 20.3082 21 0.9671 0.5018 Pearson 20.9372 21 0.9970 0.4628 Number of unique profiles: 4 Model Fit Statistics Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates AIC 875.802 733.348 SC 902.502 770.061 -2 Log L 859.802 711.348 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 148.4539 3 <.0001 Score 111.2670 3 <.0001 Wald 115.1504 3 <.0001 Type 3 Analysis of Effects Wald Effect DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq cheese 3 115.1504 <.0001 ROC plot The LOGISTIC Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Standard Wald Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Intercept 9 1 -3.1058 0.4044 58.9727 <.0001 Intercept 8 1 -1.5459 0.3042 25.8287 <.0001 Intercept 7 1 -0.0443 0.2598 0.0291 0.8646 Intercept 6 1 0.9077 0.2748 10.9125 0.0010 Intercept 5 1 2.2440 0.3262 47.3307 <.0001 Intercept 4 1 3.3126 0.3697 80.2992 <.0001 Intercept 3 1 4.4121 0.4247 107.9168 <.0001 Intercept 2 1 5.4673 0.5202 110.4514 <.0001 cheese B 1 -3.3517 0.4235 62.6335 <.0001 cheese C 1 -1.7098 0.3731 21.0072 <.0001 cheese D 1 1.6128 0.3778 18.2265 <.0001 Odds Ratio Estimates Point 95% Wald Effect Estimate Confidence Limits cheese B vs A 0.035 0.015 0.080 cheese C vs A 0.181 0.087 0.376 cheese D vs A 5.017 2.393 10.520 Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Percent Concordant 67.6 Somers' D 0.578 Percent Discordant 9.8 Gamma 0.746 Percent Tied 22.6 Tau-a 0.500 Pairs 18635 c 0.789