Cohort studies are the second main type of observational study design in epidemiology. This design is desirable when there are many potential outcomes you want to investigate, when the goal is a direct measure of incidence or risk, and for rare exposures. Cohort studies can be prospective, where the investigators assemble the cohort and then follow them to observe outcomes, or retrospective when the investigators identify the cohort based on past exposures and evaluate outcomes that have already occurred. Prospective cohort studies are less vulnerable to bias and can evaluate the temporal relationship between exposure and outcome. Retrospective studies are good for diseases with long induction and latent periods. Some weaknesses of cohort studies are that they are inefficient for rare outcomes, can be very expensive and time-consuming, and retrospective cohort studies can be more prone to bias. There are many examples of large and small cohort studies, some of which have been going on for decades, and there are still many questions that can be answered from these studies!
User Preferences
Content Preview
Arcu felis bibendum ut tristique et egestas quis:
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Odit molestiae mollitia
laudantium assumenda nam eaque, excepturi, soluta, perspiciatis cupiditate sapiente, adipisci quaerat odio
voluptates consectetur nulla eveniet iure vitae quibusdam? Excepturi aliquam in iure, repellat, fugiat illum
voluptate repellendus blanditiis veritatis ducimus ad ipsa quisquam, commodi vel necessitatibus, harum quos
a dignissimos.
Keyboard Shortcuts
- Help
- F1 or ?
- Previous Page
- ← + CTRL (Windows)
- ← + ⌘ (Mac)
- Next Page
- → + CTRL (Windows)
- → + ⌘ (Mac)
- Search Site
- CTRL + SHIFT + F (Windows)
- ⌘ + ⇧ + F (Mac)
- Close Message
- ESC