An overview (also called a systematic review) attempts to summarize the scientific evidence related to treatment, causation, diagnosis, or prognosis of a specific disease. An overview does not generate any new data - it reviews and summarizes already-existing studies.
Overviews, which are relied upon by many physicians, are important because there usually exist multiple studies that have addressed a specific research question. Yet these types of studies may differ with respect to:
- Patient population
Although it appears that conducting an overview is easy, it requires a good deal of effort and care to do it well. For example, determining inclusion and exclusion criteria for studies is a major challenge for researchers when putting together a useful overview.
What does this process involve? There are six basic steps to an overview:
- Define a focused clinical question
- Conduct a thorough literature search
- Apply inclusion/exclusion criteria to the identified studies
- Abstract/summarize the data from the eligible studies
- Perform statistical analysis (meta-analysis), if appropriate
- Disseminate the results
- Describe the processes for conducting a systematic overview.
- Describe how publication bias can affect the results of a systematic review.
- Recognize patterns in a ‘funnel plot’ that would indicate potential publication bias.
- Evaluate the quality of a clinical report with the Jaded scale.
- Recognize the appropriate use of a fixed effects model vs. a random effects model for a meta-analysis. State how the weights differ between the fixed and random approaches.
- Describe the rationale for a test of heterogeneity among the studies used in a meta-analysis.
- Describe methods for performing a sensitivity analysis of the meta-analysis.
Piantadosi Steven. (2005) Reporting and Authorship. Meta-Analyses. In: Piantadosi Steven. Clinical Trials: A Methodologic Perspective. 2nd ed. Hobaken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.